For an opaque surface, what is the relationship between emissivity and reflectivity?

Prepare for the Infrared Training Center Level 1 Exam. Access flashcards and multiple-choice questions with detailed explanations to help you succeed. Ace your certification today!

Multiple Choice

For an opaque surface, what is the relationship between emissivity and reflectivity?

Explanation:
On an opaque surface, no energy transmits through, so the radiative budget at a given wavelength is split between reflection and emission (with absorption filling the rest). Since there is no transmission, the fraction that is not reflected must be absorbed, and for a surface in thermal equilibrium the absorbed portion equals the emitted portion. That makes emissivity equal to the absorbed fraction, which is 1 minus reflectivity. In other words, emissivity = 1 − reflectivity. So a surface that reflects 20% would emit 80% at that wavelength. The other options clash with energy balance or produce illogical results: emissivity equal to reflectivity would imply the emitted and reflected portions are always the same, which isn’t generally true; emissivity equal to 1 divided by reflectivity would give values outside the 0–1 range for many cases; and emissivity being independent of reflectivity ignores the fact that what isn’t reflected is what can be emitted (per Kirchhoff’s law).

On an opaque surface, no energy transmits through, so the radiative budget at a given wavelength is split between reflection and emission (with absorption filling the rest). Since there is no transmission, the fraction that is not reflected must be absorbed, and for a surface in thermal equilibrium the absorbed portion equals the emitted portion. That makes emissivity equal to the absorbed fraction, which is 1 minus reflectivity. In other words, emissivity = 1 − reflectivity. So a surface that reflects 20% would emit 80% at that wavelength.

The other options clash with energy balance or produce illogical results: emissivity equal to reflectivity would imply the emitted and reflected portions are always the same, which isn’t generally true; emissivity equal to 1 divided by reflectivity would give values outside the 0–1 range for many cases; and emissivity being independent of reflectivity ignores the fact that what isn’t reflected is what can be emitted (per Kirchhoff’s law).

Subscribe

Get the latest from Passetra

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy